Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Flash Corner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 01:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I prodded this because it looks like its purpose is to promote a NN photographer. The tag was deleted without further edits or explanation. Therefore I'm bringing it to AFD. My apologies if this is indeed an established and documented photography technique. ccwaters 17:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, the photographer, Michael David Murphy, does seem to be notable. I'll keep the article up for debate (if this is said photographer's signature style, then maybe a MERGE is more appropriate?). ccwaters 17:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)The photographer's article is autobiographical and any media references mentioned are only quick blurbs about his blog (about missed photographic opportunities). I nominate his article as well. ccwaters 18:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 01:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't think this term is widely used among photographers, the article reads more like a dictionary entry, and would probably best merit mention on a more general photography page. SteveHopson 03:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - seems to be nn jargon, 339 ghits. MER-C 05:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I saw this earlier in relation to his article, but you beat me to the afd... nn person - both this & his bio article should go. SkierRMH,06:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable term, no evidence of wide use, article promotes photographer's own site. JIP | Talk 08:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No neologisms. FirefoxMan 16:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN jargon, neologism, possibly exists only for the vanity link. Doc Tropics 18:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn notable term possibly for self promotion because I don't think it's a common term used by photogs. Delete on the nn bio too.--John Lake 16:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.