Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbit Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orbit Media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are written as a blog on independent sources by the close associate of the company. Nothing significant coverage or references are given. Misleading popular references presented as media coverage. References are very poor. Does not meet notability criteria. Light21 07:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Blatantly promotional, deceptive sourcing - David Gerard (talk) 16:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO as "corporate spam". The page exists to promote the business. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.