Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSPseq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 07:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PSPseq

no evidence of notability. Random online blog coverage doesn't give notability. Notability comes from significant coverage by reliable sources. It being an "underground" software, web only software, etc doesn't give it a pass on the same requirements all articles must meet. We're not an indiscriminate collection of information and this particular software doesn't meet the requirements that the community have created. If reliable sources start writing about, I don't oppose recreation. Crossmr (talk) 02:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 06:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MuZemike (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources found to denote this software's notability (i.e. no reliable source showing substantial coverage). Jappalang (talk) 00:47, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete seems to be nn WikiScrubber (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: Two of the external links look somewhat respectable and demonstrate a minute amount of coverage. I would redirect to PlayStation Portable homebrew in the remote chance more coverage can be found. Though if the consensus leans towards deletion, I really wouldn't oppose. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Weak delete - The BoingBoing and CreateDigitalMusic items are more akin to press releases rather than substantial coverage, explicitly ruled out by WP:N. The HackADay site is currently down but the link promises a "short interview" which is good, but I query the reliability of the site and I would prefer multiple coverage anyway. I may change my opinion once I can actually get a look at the link. Marasmusine (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.