Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Kpozo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Kpozo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So far only one appearance on the bench for AIK, and he's been on the team for a few months now. I say he fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY both. JTtheOG (talk) 06:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Since his cup appearance was against a non-fully-pro-league club, it does not confer notability either. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.