Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Weaver
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 01:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable young player who fails WP:GNG due to lack of "significant coverage", as well as WP:NFOOTBALL as he has yet to play in a fully-professional league. Karma-AH (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 00:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - player fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 01:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league, meaning he fails WP:NSPORT, and there is insufficient coverage for him to meet WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 17:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. A couple of external links as references, but still no significant coverage found. No career history in fully professional leagues. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Zanoni (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.