Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter M. Swartz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 08:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter M. Swartz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2008. Sounds like a WP:Promotion - I don't think he is notable Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems like a promotional article about a non-notable subject. --Jersey92 (talk) 22:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unable to establish notability. ~KvnG 15:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.