Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phyllis Keino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A rationale for deletion was not provided in the proposed deletion (diff, notice how the "concern =" parameter is empty) prior to this nomination (link). As such, a valid rationale for deletion was never presented in either of these processes. WP:NPASR that provides a valid rationale for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phyllis Keino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD and other templates removed with absolutely no explanations at all and I still confirm my removed PROD. SwisterTwister talk 17:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted. Phyllis Keino meets Wikipedia's standards for notoriety and the majority of the citations have been replaced with outside sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.202.211.195 (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep WP:NPASR WP:SK#1 No argument for deletion. Unscintillating (talk) 23:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Please enough, and stay away from me, you have caused nothing but attacks against me. My confirming of PROD is sufficient in itself. SwisterTwister talk 23:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply] Please comment on contributions, not on contributors. Thank you, Unscintillating (talk) 01:55, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.