Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Daisy Flower Adventures
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Princess Daisy Flower Adventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Its a video game review and guide. Isnt suitable for Wikipedia LorChat 02:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per G3, blatant hoax. Jucchan (talk) 04:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a hoax. I searched under this specific name and under just "Princess Daisy" and "game". I can't find anything to verify that there's a game in development under this title and it's very unlikely that a Mario related game would receive no coverage at all. It's especially unlikely given that E3 wrapped up fairly recently and Nintendo would have mentioned a Princess Daisy game in order to gain coverage to help bolster sales, even if it was just a brief mention at a booth or an offhand comment elsewhere. Given the lack of coverage, this is a fairly obvious hoax. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.