Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protect Marriage Washington
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Protect Marriage Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, one-note religious group that has never done anything but lobby to get a single political referendum introduced in one single state. He Died For Your Evil Sins (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:CORP. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree, fails WP:CORP. Sort of want to say fails WP:BLP1E but that's for biographies. Is there an equivalent policy for other categories of subject?Simonm223 (talk) 21:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, I'm not going vote since I created the article. I'm going to make a case though. Yes, they probably will fade away in a few weeks and are a "one-note" group but being a one-hit wonder doesn't make them non-notable. I disagree with them failing CORPS. Here is an article from the New York Times mentioning them. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/us/21signatures.html. Here is one from the LA Times. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-court-confidential23-2009oct23,0,7762080.story. The Supreme Court and the Washington State Supreme Courts have heard cases from them. Also, there is a keep vote in the talk page of the article if that helps my case at all. I'll go with the consensus though. P.S. Sorry, Wikipedia isn't allowing me to log in properly so I'm approximating on my time stamp. NeoJustin (Talk page) 03:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.214.252 (talk) [reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.