Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protik Prokash Banerji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protik Prokash Banerji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially reads like a resume with no secondary or independent sources included (I didn't find any on a quick search either). The claims for notability are borderline: a couple of university level awards that may not be noteworthy by themsleves (searching for them leads to this article itself); and apparently winning a case for his client, the importance of which is again difficult to assess given the lack of secondary sources. The bio thus fails to meet the WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO standards. Abecedare (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only borderline claims of notability to me is that case, but that appears insufficient to pass GNG.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 10:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.