Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulickaparampil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Pulickaparampil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Article is a family history/genealogy. No reliable sources provided, none found. I am hard-pressed to see how this family is notable. TNXMan 18:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability established for family or any of its members. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not assert notability. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 19:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, no external sources. LK (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NNVulture19 (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No assertion of notability, a quick search indicates the same. — neuro(talk) 13:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Family is not famous, therefore not deserving of an article. Belongs on a family tree website. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 21:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.