Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachid Sbihi
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rachid Sbihi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC. not much in Google scholar and google news. if someone can find some articles in Arabic I'll reconsider. LibStar (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The hits that show up in Google Scholar refer to another person: an economist called Mohammed Rachid Sbihi. See here: http://www.esdg.ma/motdirection.php --CronopioFlotante (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. —Qwfp (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, quite clearly fails PROF and BIO. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I notice there's a page interwiki link to the corresponding article on the Arabic Wikipedia, which appears to be an unreferenced stub, though my Arabic is non-existent. Google Translate seems to have a fair stab at it, with the exception of the name of his hometown. I've placed a neutrally-worded message at Talk:Masinissa in the hope of attracting more enlightened discussion, as the article on Rachid Sbihi appears to be claiming that he solved "Masinissa's enigma". Qwfp (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability does not seem to have been established. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.