Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reich & Tang Deposit Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reich & Tang Deposit Networks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure company that doesn't even come close to meeting WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Zero coverage. Created by an SPA, which figures. Coretheapple (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coretheapple (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Can you please explain why this should be in deletion after many years passed. What is main thing you saw it other that the reason you mentioned here? Just elaborate more..Jyoti Roy (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IF you believe the article should be retained because "many years have passed," please do so but be advised it is likely to be discounted by the closer. See WP:LONGTIME WP:CONTENTAGE. If you are just making a general comment and have no opinion on this AfD, please take it to talk. Coretheapple (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my nom. Totally run of the mill company, has received zero coverage (I checked Google, Newspapes,com, ProQuest and the New York Times archives) and doesn't even issue press releases for itself. No claim to notability and should have been speedied long ago. Coretheapple (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.