Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ringo Ma
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ringo Ma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is this professor sufficiently notable? I don't think so, but I'm not sure. Delete unless notability shown. --Nlu (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, citations are insufficient, no sign of any other basis for notability. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Like Nomoskedasticity, I don't think the citation record is enough for a convincing pass of WP:PROF#C1, and his administrative role isn't significant enough for a pass that way either. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.