Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert J. Polls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I've speedy deleted both copies of this article as it was a copyright violation. The paragraph was heavily plagiarised from the Polis entry at atybriefcase.com and the experience section was lifted from www.judicatewest.com. It's also likely the article was posted by someone avoiding a block and I have asked a checkuser to take a look at the account. Sarah 05:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert J. Polls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable judge of one of the lowest state courts in California - fails WP:BIO. Ironholds (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This Judge today is a well regarded person of notiablity in California. He has a great deal of published work, but giving the story 1 day to evolve is not right Only4thetruth (talk) 14:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then please provide evidence of notability as per WP:BIO, as you have been told to do repeatedly about this article and others. Ironholds (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note. The article has been misnamed. The correct article title is Robert J. Polis. A duplicate article has been made there. We should consider the fate of both articles here. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Robert J. Polls as an implausible typo not worth redirecting.
Neutral on Robert J. Polis. He gets some Google News hits but I don't know if they are sufficient. Is a judge notable just because the cases he tries are notable? --DanielRigal (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.