Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robot Goes Here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 20 days with only the nominator arguing for deletion (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robot Goes Here

Non-notable music act with little media coverage of substance. Fails WP:BAND. TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A few third-party album reviews include: Synthopia which I found through Google News; The Phoenix, a college newspaper; Side One: Track One; Earshot; Truepunk; Smother.net; Sea of Tranquility; Rock Is Life. So far I haven't found coverage in mainstream news articles, although Dave Rand himself has received some press for his scientific work (one example). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: What about an article covering Dave Rand with a section about the music project? --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 15:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If Rand can be shown to pass WP:BIO, that would be a fine idea. Most of the Google News hits I found, however, were about an exec at GM, not a Harvard grad student. TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nja²⁴⁷ 09:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep (since I did not actually offer a !vote earlier) per the multiple album reviews I noted above. I haven't searched extensively for Dave Rand's scientific work to see if he warrants a separate biography. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.