Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roey Peleg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. This is a close question, as many of the "keep" votes lack supporting evidence or a foundation in policy. However, some do speak to the possibility of improvement with sources not presently found in the article. The absence of consensus does not spare this article from being renominated for deletion at a future point if additional reliable sources containing sufficiently in-depth coverage of the subject are not provided. BD2412 T 03:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roey Peleg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a social activist who does not seem to have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. I see passing mentions and quotes from him as a spokesperson but nothing to suggest that he as an individual has attracted the kind of interest that would demonstrate notability. May be too soon. Mccapra (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mccapra: Per your request; Read up: https://news.walla.co.il/item/3407417 | https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/protest2020/.premium-1.9309309 | https://www.mako.co.il/news-israel/2020_q3/Article-72e3cf191e36471027.htm | https://www.timesofisrael.com/dozens-demonstrate-against-netanyahu-near-private-home-in-caesarea/ | https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4295757,00.html--Omer Toledano (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I did not want to !vote delete, but couldn't find anything but mentions. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements and this article does not have SIGCOV. The above Keeps fail to provide any sources to backup their votes. He is obviously well known, but per WP:N being well known is not a substitute for SIGCOV is IS RS. Again this is a BLP about a hot topic and needs to strictly follow sourcing and notability guidelines.   // Timothy :: talk  15:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Most of the sources are in Hebrew and there's a lot of puffery going on so it is hard to separate the facts from the fiction. For example, Peleg clearly isn't a "leading activist[]s in the struggle to find a cure for ALS" He may have had a role in the submarine protests, but how significant his role was is impossible to tell. ImTheIP (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Peleg is a known activist and a leading protest figure in Israel. It has Encyclopedic importance. Laliv g (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep There is importance. Peleg is one of the well-known activists in the protest.BAswim (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I don’t think there us any doubt that Peleg is well-known in Israel but for Wikipedia, notability is established by sustained in-depth coverage, and this has still not been shown. Of the links shared by Omer Toledano I can’t read much of the piece in HaAretz as I’m not a subscriber but it’s clearly about the protests and not about Peleg. The Ynet news piece won’t open for me. Mako news us about him but it’s an interview, and the rest are passing mentions about his arrest. Mccapra (talk) 10:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the link [2] - it is open, free, and at least you will be able to judge his results in Ironman Triathlon and Ultraman (endurance challenge)--Yoavd (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: this discussion is over the mandatory 7 days and a consensus has been reached to Keep the article. Please close the discussion and remove the template. --Omer Toledano (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll wait for an admin to close it. Mccapra (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Omer. Please close the discussion and remove the template.--היידן (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.