Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Bell (politician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ron Bell (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN (local councillor, coverage is not substantial enough for WP:BIO). PROD was removed by user who created the article. —Snigbrook 15:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As this stage, notability to pass WP:POLITICIAN is not present. SunCreator (talk) 15:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN, with a lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources. Timmeh! 20:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - local councillor, so there is a small amount of media coverage, but as mentioned above, this does not establish notability. If he is elected to Parliament, then he should have an article. Warofdreams talk 10:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.