Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby Lions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by nominator (whom also happens to be me), So speedy keep per WP:SNOW and close per IAR. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby Lions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Team plays in the Midlands 5 West (South), which is a Level 10 English Rugby Union League. Now I don't know much about Rugby, but that doesn't sound very high. The Lions are the only team in the league to have a Wikipedia Page, and the entire team is made up of links to people with similar names or DAB pages, save for the "notable players" that have moved up through the ranks. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – look at their history. Notably club per Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union/Notability#Clubs 2011–12 season, the Lions won the National League 3 Midlands Hamish59 (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - looks notable under project notability and under WP:GNG as has multiple sources available. Keith D (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.