Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalimar TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shalimar Television Network (STN). Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shalimar TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage. Vanity website, fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 13:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Merge/Redirect – To Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage (Pakistan) at this time. There is already a section dealing with SRBC. Note, however, I can see a separate article dealing with Shalimar TV in the very near future. ShoesssS ^Talk 14:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Per WP:BROADCAST, which wisely states that " Because of the public interest served, most television stations that produce original content should be presumed notable for Wikipedia purposes." Also, WP:NWEB is shockingly inapropos. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. This is just the entertainment part of Shalimar Television Network (STN), which is a short article and can cope with the extra content easily enough. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shalimar Television Network (STN). No evidence of notability inherently. Ajf773 (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shalimar Television Network (STN). MT Train^Talk 06:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect this and Shamilar Television Network (STN) to ATV (Pakistan), the current entity which shares these entity's heritage. The latter suggestion is just as bad a mess; a merge of simplified content to ATV is for the best here. Nate • (chatter) 05:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is another similar article named Network Television Marketing. @Mrschimpf:, @Mark the train:, @Ajf773:, @Prince of Thieves:, @Shoessss: What are your thoughts now, should we redirect these two to STN or all three to ATV Pakistan as suggested by Nate. Störm (talk) 13:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, redirect all three to ATV (Pakistan). -- Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes....if at the end of the AFD, and that is the consensus, Yes. If you need help doing it let me know. ShoesssS ^Talk 13:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Redirect all to ATV (Pakistan) if there is consensus. MT Train^Talk 16:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Agreed wholeheartedly. Nate • (chatter) 23:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.