Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shift (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Shift (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Shift (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article looks like made underpaid contributions to Wikipedia and this software itself is not notable individually it's a complete advertisement. So Here I nominate this article for Deletion. MrZINE 11:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 11:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 11:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 11:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

• I assume you mean undisclosed paid contributions. Although they may be underpaid, we never know. :) ^{[Username Needed]} 11:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

If they were underpaid, would they have less motivation to make it so advertorial? Nosebagbear (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

• Delete No significant technical innovation is evident, nor is market share. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - This software fails WP:GNG and I can't find a more reliable source. Skirts⁸⁹ 12:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG --Plaxie (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
• Keep (Article author) - Recent release notes show ongoing development. I am a Shift customer who published this article to share information with other users and developers. I received no compensation. Further recent updates to the article add to general notability of the product WP:GNG Mcc14ne (talk) 20:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC) (talk)

• Delete. The company, Redbrick Technologies is not notable and registers very little from WP:RS for WP:GNG. The product itself is reviewed in various tech blogs but nothing in these reviews gives any impression that this is a notable product (sometimes it is reviewed in a group with other substitute products); so fails NPRODUCT. Britishfinance (talk) 14:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.