Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shui On Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Significant amount of sources found to improve the article. (non-admin closure) Fats40boy11 (talk) 12:14, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Shui On Centre

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Shui On Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines. The building was built in the 1980s, but does not seem to have any significant background, apart from being an office building, or history. If I am missing something important about this building, then please let me know. Fats40boy11 (talk) 05:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Hong Kong. Shellwood (talk) 07:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. "港灣道瑞安中心，四年四月可竣工". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1986-12-01. p. 7. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  2. "業務多元化瑞安中心將啓用，瑞安現價仍可再升". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1986-12-02. p. 27. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  3. "廿五億元瑞安中心交易趨明朗，中山國際交訂金今到期，傳海外信託允借三億元，料可如期繳付，市塲又傳瑞安中心再放盤". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1989-01-18. p. 21. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  4. "投資六億位於灣仔海旁，瑞安中心昨平頂，許家屯羅康瑞主持儀式". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1986-12-12. p. 4. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  5. "瑞安中心已入伙". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1987-06-22. p. 10. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  6. "瑞安分拆需延期，瑞安中心年底前料租罄". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1987-09-26. p. 13. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  7. "瑞安研究多項投資，集中發展地產物業，羅康瑞稱瑞安中心已租出五成". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1987-03-22. p. 10. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  8. "市塲再傳瑞安中心易手". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1989-03-08. p. 21. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  9. "瑞安中心正式售出，除收益差價實22億，買家為BONSTAG傳為台灣財團，此次交易使瑞安獲利達十九億元". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1988-11-22. p. 19. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  10. "瑞安中心交易詳情公布，羅康瑞强調買方履合約，已收訂金五千萬下月收三億餘款四月前交齊，此次交易瑞安可清償債項並有十六億流動金". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1988-12-30. p. 19. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  11. "瑞安中心的交易須澄清". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1988-12-02. p. 21. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  12. "瑞安中心被撻訂後有買盤，多個財團表示洽購，瑞案說價格要提高，羅康瑞稱不允中山國際延期交訂致告吹". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1989-01-20. p. 21. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  13. "瑞安半年純利六千萬，增長近六成派息三仙，瑞安中心將安排貸款以增資擴展". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1988-01-09. p. 9. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  14. "東南亞財團出價19億，傳瑞安中心即將易手，該價與八八年中山國際出價低二成四，市場謂買家已獲銀行支持並交付訂金". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1991-06-20. p. 27. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  15. "瑞安中心傳易手，不確何國寧來函加以澄清". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1991-06-22. p. 11. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  16. "瑞安中心傳售予日資，作價高達二十五億元，瑞安聲明透露正洽售資產昨申請停牌，倘協議瑞安獲利二十億約每股賺兩元". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1988-11-19. p. 17. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  17. "十九億元大交易，市場有兩項傳聞有關地利根德閣及瑞安中心". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1991-06-04. p. 21. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  18. "何鴻燊談信德業務，今年積極投資地產，曾洽購瑞安中心因價錢不合告吹". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1989-02-04. p. 17. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  19. "瑞安中心塞翁之福". Ta Kung Pao (in Chinese). 1989-05-13. p. 17. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  20. "據田土廳資料顯示，十一月物業市道旺，其中瑞安中心高價轉手及天水團樓價至九七年時會較現在升逾一倍，對用家入市信心幫助頗大，但十二月銀行加息半厘，相信會對大市有所影響的". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1988-12-12. p. 16. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  21. "瑞安中心交易不成，灣仔官地仍具吸引". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1989-01-24. p. 19. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  22. "傳購香港紗廠文華中心，中山國際重重面紗，瑞安中心易手存疑". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1988-12-15. p. 44. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  23. "文康市政科若干部門，星期一遷往瑞安中心". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1988-09-11. p. 4. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  24. "瑞安中心交易告吹影響不大，灣仔地王今午拍賣，身價料達卅三億元，成交價足以左右物業市道走勢". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1989-01-25. p. 10. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  25. "瑞安中心重估後集團資產值逾九億". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1987-08-14. p. 17. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  26. "瑞安中心交易成功，刺激沒市地產向好". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1989-01-16. p. 20. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  27. "瑞安現與多個財團，商討出租瑞安中心，每呎租金約五十元至五十五元。". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1989-04-27. p. 20. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  28. "統籌建新機場辦事處，集中在灣仔瑞安中心，財政司翟克誠探訪新辦事處". Wah Kiu Yat Po (in Chinese). 1990-09-05. p. 3. Retrieved 2022-07-24 – via Hong Kong Public Libraries.
  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Shui On Centre (Chinese: 瑞安中心) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 11:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks for all these sources. I was mistaken in listing this for deletion, and given these sources, it is obvious this shouldn’t have made it to AFD. Fats40boy11 (talk) 12:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

• Comment from nominator – Withdraw Given the sources that have been listed above, it is impossible to say that the building is not notable. Therefore, I would like to withdraw this AFD. Fats40boy11 (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.