Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Pollack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Pollack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to demonstrate the subject's notability by showing that he has "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Eddie Blick (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article title is misspelled. It should be Simon Pollak. There is plenty of secondary coverage and I'm going to add some of that. He was one of the earliest U.S. ophthalmologists (first one in St. Louis, first eye/ear clinic west of Mississippi), in addition to his work founding the school for the blind. I'll move to the appropriate spelling. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the correct spelling Simon Pollak. An online search with this spelling reveals plenty of reliable resources to work with and establish WP:BIO notability. -- IsaacSt (talk) 03:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. The as-nominated article already had a plausible case for WP:GNG but now the case is clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.