Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Hits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Weezer discography. Stifle (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Six Hits

No reliable sources. Exclusive release in Target stores, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Artist samplers are something less than genuine releases, therefore probably not noteworthy Hairhorn (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Just as significant as any other greatest hits album. You might as well get rid of these too... Also for clarification it is an album offered at Best Buy in lieu of Target. -Ichabod (talk) 03:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 04:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. I see a Delete-a-thon on the horizon. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 04:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's a difference between a "greatest hits" album, that gets full release, promotion and new artwork, and a commercial sampler that's thrown together without involvement from the band and with no new content. (Also...ahem... greatest hits albums usually have more than 6 hits... ) Hairhorn (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MUSIC as above. Eusebeus (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Weezer discography, which currently fails to mention it at all.--Remurmur (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Weezer discography#Extended plays, per WP:NALBUMS.Fingers ^OnRoids 01:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.