Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmarterChild

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per consensus and the addition of references to the article. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SmarterChild

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. One press release, one circular Wikipedia mirror, and one blog mention does not make a product, even a discontinued product, notable. JBsupreme (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, significant coverage in the New York Times, Washington Post, Toronto Star, among others. I've added the citations to the article. Glenfarclas (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The NYT and WashPost references seem to provide enough coverage to satisfy WP:N. — Rankiri (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 19:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 19:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it seems to be notable, given Glanfarclas' references, and also some hits on google books for example. Joshua Scott (talk) 03:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.