Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steemit. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Steem

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability not established, sources are primary, self-published (Github), or do not contain any citable information about Steem (the Wired piece only lists the market cap, the rest is about Steemit). Investopedia is not neutral as can be seen from the tabloid headline (the link is also dead). Express.co.uk is a tabloid, cannot be trusted. SteemPeak is obviously not independent coverage. A block explorer cannot be cited, it is primary. FourWeekMBA is a owned by a venture company and cannot be trusted to be independent. Ysangkok (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands - the only RS is the mention in the Guardian, about the price going up. That's not enough to sustain an article. The rest appears to be unreliable sources, questionable sources, crypto sources and primary sources - David Gerard (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Steemit. Ҥ (talk) 04:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect works for me too - David Gerard (talk) 10:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.