Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Padgitt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The reasons for deletion were not compelling, and nobody !voted delete after the sources identified by David Eppstein. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Padgitt

The article does not give evidence or explanation of notability Ecoleetage (talk) 01:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Article is over five years old, with not much added. Delete A²Kafir (and...?) 02:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Cannot find any evidence that this professor meets WP:PROF. TN‑X-Man 02:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well published and his rural planning work has been covered in reliable sources. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 19:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I see 12 or 13 articles, no books at all, and several dozen conference presentations. I;m having a hard time verifying his position, but he turns out to be an Emeritus Professor [1]--not all such pages appear in Google. He apparent is or was director of one ofthe sociology units of ISU Extension per [2], Frankly, less than convincing. The GNews links almost all come from the same presentation, but I have yet to identify it. Pre-internet era faculty without published books are often rather hard to document adequately.DGG (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.