Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sulfuric acid anodizing electrolyte method.
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sulfuric acid anodizing electrolyte method. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly written, unsourced, original research article about anodizing. Duplicates some of the content already covered at anodizing. This article was apparently created as a WP:COATRACK for adding a spam link to a vendor of anodized aluminum products. I do not see that there is anything in the article worth salvaging. - MrX 21:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kolbasz (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Article creator has attempted to spam his website into other articles and admits to a WP:COI of the manager of the commercial website.Martin451 19:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.