Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Madakor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Madakor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I hate to send one to AFD so soon, particularly since the article was created in good faith, but this is a classic case of violating WP:BLP1E. It isn't fair to the subject of the BLP, and this gets us into the news business rather than encyclopedia business. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very much a violation of the not news guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(author) Question: I thought about the BLP1E concept, and it being 2 decades later, what remains is the question: is there a situation like this in any article,

including that she sued? Agreed she does not deserve to be the sacrifice to illustrate the concept/situation. This situation is about free lunch/unjust enrichment and restitution. There remains the question: where, if OK, should a link to the [https://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/05/nyregion/for-lottery-winner -who-wasn-t-bank-account-remains-frozen.html NYTimes "For Lottery Winner Who Wasn't, Bank Account Remains Frozen"] go (without direct comment or mention of her name)? Pi314m (talk) 17:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That has nothing to do with Susan and doesn't establish her notability. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a place where the situation fits, then is a link to the NYTimes a BLP1E, even if her name is not explicitly in Wiki? Pi314m (talk) 23:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources are limited. WP:GNG is not fully met. Estarosmārṭ (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.