Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syscoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Syscoin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement for yet another non-notable cryptocurrency. Entirely sourced to advert/tech blogs, press releases, and social media. The advert tone could be fixed, but the notability problem would remain: I can find no significant coverage in independent sources or in-depth third party WP:RS coverage that is even close to passing WP:NCORP or WP:GNG, just press releases and advertorial: in short a ton of well-orchestrated promo for it as a product. Draft articles are also starting to pop up here from other WP:SPAs, for the equally non-notable company that owns it, and the company's founder. TMG^talk 18:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 18:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 18:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 18:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete given challenges of finding any RS to help establish notability. As nom points out current sourcing is poor. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no claim of notability, and the current article is largely promotional bullshit. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to understand how you don't see Syscoin as a notable crypto currency. It has been around and been actively under development for almost 10 years! I mean like every single day. No other cryptos can really say this besides Bitcoin. 2001:569:5155:FC00:ADEF:F4C6:C4E9:AEAD (talk) 02:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - oh my, lots and lots of completely promotional BS, including a section on "features" with a formatted list of sub-features and then planned features in the next section. Promotional. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.