Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheCarConnection.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to High Gear Media. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheCarConnection.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional website content article. References are very poor. Press coverage questionable in nature. Nothing significant or notable about the website to be here. Light21 07:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to High Gear Media - David Gerard (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to High Gear Media where it's already mentioned. Otherwise, not independently notable and reads like a WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to High Gear Media - No sources on Google however imho it's better off redirected. –Davey2010^Talk 13:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and then Redirect as the fate of this company was sealed when it was acquired and ended its own independence, the fact one of the comments above states it's currently mentioned there, it would in that case be unnecessary to save any contents if there's enough information at said article; certainly the other article would not need to be expanded any larger if it's simply an acquired company now, thus no need for any other information other than what's listed. Essentially what's listed here as it is was only the basic information about the company, that then talked about its normal company activities, that's nothing outstanding. SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to High Gear Media. Some sources cover this (e.g. [1]), but the depth of coverage available is not enough to qualify a standalone article. Bits of content could possibly be selectively merged. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.