Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Disciples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Disciples

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Books. The book has not received any non-trivial reviews. Inter change able|talk to me 18:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I've found two reviews, but I'm not sure if that's really enough to keep it. As a side note, I've found that the book was co-written by VC Andrews. Not sure if that counts towards anything, though.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 06:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Two reviews in notable third-party publications (as per Tokyogirl's references in the article) = multiple, non-trivial, independent sources, and hence a pass of WP:NBOOK#1. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.