Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twingo snooker
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Twingo snooker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article about a non-notable game. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 20:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is the only contribution by this Wikipedian, with an account set up almost immediately before the article was written. It is both non-notable and a very low-quality article - and I wouldn't be surprised to find the user is a sockpuppet or some other kind of abuser of Wikipedia. Lukeno94 (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Sounds like a game somebody made up in the car. Definitely not for Wikipedia. ~Adjwilley (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, violates WP:V. --Kinu t/c 22:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's funny. But WP:ITSFUNNY. Not a single reference on google books, google news or google. Indicates it may be WP:MADEUP. Misses all notability guidelines by a long way. --Batard0 (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of notability. No sources. Reads like, and likely is, something someone made up one day.--xanchester (t) 23:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nomination, also quite frankly, I don't see the notability in Car cricket. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 13:30, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.