Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Mitchell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ty Mitchell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant, independent coverage 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Entertainment. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender, New York, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In a rebuttal to one of his pieces on Buzzfeed, Towleroad wrote a lengthy piece about how problematic it was (here). He had a skit on SNL with actress Emma Stone; coverage of that appeared in Out, Towleroad, and Q Life Media (here, here, and here, respectively). It was the first SNL sketch to host a real-life gay porn star. He appeared on Daniel M. Lavery's podcast Big Mood, Little Mood (here). He had a role in the non-porn parody Sock Suckers by Scruff (here). He raised money for Bernie Sanders' presidential bid (here). He was named as Outs one of "The Most Exciting Queers to Follow in 2019" (here). --Kbabej (talk) 08:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per the above. I have added some of the references into the article - some of the references listed above seem to only mention Ty Mitchell in passing. – QueenofBithynia (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC) (edited - QueenofBithynia (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Keep I think there's room for improvement in the article, but they seem to be notable enough to pass a simple sniff test. Nauseous Man (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Kbabej and Nauseous Man, article seems short but expandable with some work. Tajaditas^(talk) 04:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.