Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usmart Securities
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Usmart Securities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No establishment of notability using independent WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: PROMO. Mentioned in articles about suspending trading accounts, which are glossed over here. One is paywalled, the others aren't strictly about this firm. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: sources 3 and 8 are about Brightsmart, which seems to be a different company. I'm not seeing how they're related to this company, unsure why they're being used for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Not enough reliable sources are available. There is even a press release used. Z3r0h3r000 (talk) 07:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.