Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valitor
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Valitor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Routine not deep enough media coverage. Actually, it doesn't meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH. Asketbouncer (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Strong keep - Easily passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in the Icelandic media as a WP:BEFORE would have shown [1][2][3][4][5][6] Alvaldi (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Alvaldi's comment. --Bensin (talk) 21:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 10:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 10:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As there is significant coverage in Icelandic media.Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Alvaldi proved there are reliable sources in the Icelandic media. The Wikileaks source should be removed though. Curbon7 (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.