Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Whizz40 (talk) 20:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This textbook is in its 6th edition. The nominator needs to explain how they've determined that it fails WP:NBOOK#4. pburka (talk) 21:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been a week and the nom hasn't replied, so keep. I presume a textbook from a major publisher that makes it to 6 editions has to be widely taught somewhere. Somebody's clearly buying them, and I doubt it's beach reading. pburka (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I was able to access a college database and found sourcing via several reviews on the book. It also looks like it's been cited over 2000 times per Google Scholar. While GS isn't a RS in and of itself, the extensive amount of cites does give off the impression that there's more sourcing out there than what I've added. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:TBK per ReaderofthePack. - hako9 (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.