Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBR Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WBR Corporation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The notability criteria are not met in this article. The sources given are mostly businesswire/PR articles, or don't mention the subject at all. The "World Book of Records" is not the Guinness one, and doesn't appear to be any kind of major award. The other award claimed is not supported by the reference and I can't verify it. The two Forbes PDFs are marketing supplements. Google search for "WBR Corporation" and "WPR Corp" total about 100 results. They've done a lot of things, but there is not much written about them. ... discospinster _talk 21:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Falls short of WP:CORPDEPTH and the language used in the article makes it border on a speedy candidate. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks the in-depth, independent coverage needed to meet WP:NCORP.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep online to give chance for additional changes - I would like to add more information to this page in line with the feedback, please keep online to allow time to make this happen, cheers SimonPenil (talk) 12:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks indepth coverage and fails in qualifying wikipedia companies notability criteria. Zinzhanglee (talk) 02:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. No reliable source. Barca (talk) 12:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 23:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.