Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick, Washington
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Warwick, Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A station on a now-abandoned SP&S rail line, and in this case I was fortunate enough to find two older maps, one from 1913 and the other from 1936, which make it clear that there was never a town here, a view ratified by later aerials and topos. There's just no notability here. Mangoe (talk) 05:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Changed to Delete There appears to be enough for an article to exist. It was a community with enough importance for a railroad stop and a post office. The article does need improvements. Super (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, that's not how it worked. Stations without towns were common (and in a sense are even more so now). Mangoe (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- I would also note that there's no concept of "importance" in our notability guidelines. WP:GEOLAND requires either legal recognition or significant coverage to meet GNG. Which of those criteria is this !vote based on? –dlthewave ☎ 15:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, that's not how it worked. Stations without towns were common (and in a sense are even more so now). Mangoe (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep While WP:NOT does not apply here because towns get articles anyway, don't they, this probably doesn't need to be an AfD? --CappellsFromSkelmersdale (talk) 11:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Editor blocked for disruption. –dlthewave ☎ 16:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "towns get articles anyway"? –dlthewave ☎ 14:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GEOLAND which requires either legal recognition or GNG-level SIGCOV. –dlthewave ☎ 16:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - GNIS spam. Not a WP:GNG pass, no legal recognition. Post offices do not confer legal recognition - they can be mobile, they can be in stores, they can be in stations, they need not be within a community. This idea that Wikipedia hosts articles on places that literally no encyclopaedic article can be written about needs to die: Wikipedia is not a gazetteer and does not just include directory listings as articles. FOARP (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Ok thanks for the info User:FOARPon post offices. I thought they had to be based in a city or town. Super (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.