Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webmonkey ash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 11:02, Dec. 17, 2005

Webmonkey ash

Probably non-notable biography, but making some claim to notablility. Joyous | Talk 19:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN --Schmiteye 19:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nn. I bet 100 % of wikipedia admins would say that they are "talented web-designers"? feydey 20:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

he is well known in internet circles. 'weebl and bob' gets millions of hits..and the webcomic list is also very popular. both are well known sites particularly the weebl and bob one. but if hes not well known enough for wiki im sorry --Aubiekat 20:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, weebl and its creator get hits, but this is a totally different person, just professionally connected, a webmaster i'd guess. feydey 20:24, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, The Webcomic list may deserve an entry (doesn't have one as of when I checked) but I don't see this bio as notable. ++Lar 19:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

well i see your points. if i can get a promise an entry for the webcomic list won't be non notable I'll write one about it. it really is an interesting site--Aubiekat 00:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I suspect no one can promise you that. But you yourself could review the notability guidelines and the deletion criteria and decide for yourself if you feel the site is notable before you invest time in writing an article. Some thought starters: (don't answer here, just think about them): How many users does the site have? What other sites reference it? has it had articles written about it in printed media? have notable webcomics authors cited it as an influence? Does it provide a meaningful service that other sites do not? Does it have industry presence? Are the owners included on convention webcomic panels?These pages may also help: WP:GD and WP:WEB If you conclude that the site would not be judged notable enough for a Wikipedia article, consider an article at Comixpedia Hope that helps. ++Lar 17:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or at least seriously amend it. Webmonkey Ash might well not be worthy of an entry, but then he has coded the Weebl and Bob website which gets millions of hits (meshinks), although I would say that the webcomic list doesn't warrant a seperate entry, although certainly on Comixpedia. At least change it so it doesn't look like his mum wrote it Perks 11:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.