Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilson (Home Improvement)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Home Improvement characters. Cirt (talk) 08:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wilson (Home Improvement) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete. Absolutely non-notable and nothing more than TV trivia. George Pelltier (talk) 05:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge important character in a long running prime time sitcom. RMHED. 17:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 00:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Home Improvement characters. Everything valuable is already on that page. There seems to be no need for a separate article, unless some one has more information than can conveniently fit there.Cool3 (talk) 00:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll go with redirect to List of Home Improvement characters, even though none of the content either in this article or that list is sourced. I'd recommend that folks start supplying reliable sources that verify the information about, and establish the notability of, these Home Improvement characters if they want the material to remain. Deor (talk) 02:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per above. Had this been a sourced article with a critical discussion of the character (which, by the way, is as "major" as Al, Jill, or the Taylor children), I would have recommended a "keep." But this "in-universe" article is not appropriate for Wikipedia. B.Wind (talk) 03:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and merge whatever can best be included in the Wilson section of the main article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.