Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Championship of Legends (Cricket)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- World Championship of Legends (Cricket) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable cricket tournament trying to use WP:NOTINHERITED to assert a notability. Just because a number of notable former players competed at this event, it doesn't mean the event itself is notable, and the coverage for the event does not pass WP:GNG. We have deleted many similar non-notable "legends/masters" event articles like this in the past. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and England. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: It's the same page that was deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Championship of Legends, now under a new title. Both titles should be salted as well. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I found this title notable as it has enough good references on trusted websites. It is different from the previous page and this is a notable tournament approved by England and Wales Cricket Board. I invite Red_Phoenix to share the views here as i can saw their contribution on the page earlier.Shawshank123 (talk) 06:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's the same tournament that was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Championship of Legends (although that was an AFD with minimal participation). Please provide evidence that it passes WP:GNG rather than just stating that it's notable- most of the sources are just WP:ROUTINE coverage. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- The most I can say is I declined the speedy deletion request as being dissimilar to the linked previous deletion request, which was not to the link that Joseph2302 put above but instead to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Legends Cricket Trophy. Knowing about the other discussion now, I probably would have still recommended AFD just because of the minimal participation and the recreation that indicates someone else disagrees (this is a “spirit of the policy” interpretation rather than a letter of the policy one), but I make no opinion on how noteworthy the event itself actually is. Red Phoenix talk 14:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I made a mistake on the G4 nomination, sorry. But agree that a second AFD is more sensible than speedy deletion, as the 1st AFD had limited participation. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- The most I can say is I declined the speedy deletion request as being dissimilar to the linked previous deletion request, which was not to the link that Joseph2302 put above but instead to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Legends Cricket Trophy. Knowing about the other discussion now, I probably would have still recommended AFD just because of the minimal participation and the recreation that indicates someone else disagrees (this is a “spirit of the policy” interpretation rather than a letter of the policy one), but I make no opinion on how noteworthy the event itself actually is. Red Phoenix talk 14:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's the same tournament that was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Championship of Legends (although that was an AFD with minimal participation). Please provide evidence that it passes WP:GNG rather than just stating that it's notable- most of the sources are just WP:ROUTINE coverage. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)