Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yakimanka (Moscow Metro)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yakimanka (Moscow Metro) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The metro station which is not under construction, and not even the project exist. It is just at some point somebody decided that it would be cool to have a metro station here which would offer transfer to another station, but the decision to build the station was never taken, and the planning never started. The article is unsourced; the Russian interwiki is misleading. Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 08:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 08:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Can't really say too soon because this will never happen in the near future or ever. It is more along the lines of a WP:HOAX since a serious project has not been known to exist.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Russian interwiki leads to sources, bad faith attempt of Ymblanter. https://rg.ru/2009/12/15/yakimanka-site-anons.html 78.51.248.237 (talk) 13:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- It is nice to have IP users accusing me of bad faith, but the above source says precisely what I said in the nomination: Somebody sometime had an idea that it would be cool to build such a station, but the planning never started (note that the source is from 2009).--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, IP cannot prove it was bad faith. But your claim "The article is unsourced; the Russian interwiki is misleading." can't be proven neither. How would you substantiate the claim that it is misleading? ruWP has a full list article on not existing stations, and your deletion attempt would remove sourced information from English Wikipedia that exists in Russian Wikipedia. How does removal of verifiable sourced information help WP:PURPOSE? ru:Непостроенные станции Московского метрополитена. 77.180.119.180 (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Well, there is no Russian interwiki. There is no Russian article about this metro station. The interwiki is in fact a redirect.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- I see now that all objections on this page belong to the globally banned user Tobias Conradi.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, IP cannot prove it was bad faith. But your claim "The article is unsourced; the Russian interwiki is misleading." can't be proven neither. How would you substantiate the claim that it is misleading? ruWP has a full list article on not existing stations, and your deletion attempt would remove sourced information from English Wikipedia that exists in Russian Wikipedia. How does removal of verifiable sourced information help WP:PURPOSE? ru:Непостроенные станции Московского метрополитена. 77.180.119.180 (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- It is nice to have IP users accusing me of bad faith, but the above source says precisely what I said in the nomination: Somebody sometime had an idea that it would be cool to build such a station, but the planning never started (note that the source is from 2009).--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as having articles on stations that are not going to be built would be pointless. Current site for the Metro construction site does not even list the station. in Russian TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 13:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There are no current plans to build this location.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.