Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasmin Omar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yasmin Omar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article created by subject's spouse. Doesn't meet notability as most refs are non-notable interviews. Nswix (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Egypt. Nswix (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

delete I think it is WP:LOWPROFILE, no real notability and poor significant coverage, also the article looks like WP:MASK and written in a way that exaggerates the importance of her activities. -- Ibrahim.ID ✪ 18:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO. This is G11 content but AfD is a better forum, since I suspect recreations will need CSD'd. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 05:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.