Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoga Korunta
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yoga Korunta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no independent or scholarly research that shows the authenticity or existence of this text. Mike697 (talk) 01:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 02:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. One source? Is a detailed, policity-based argument even necessary in this case? It seems self evident. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- Received enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. The validity or non-validity of the manuscript is not an issue -- but rather that it is a subject of discussion in reliable sources, such as Huffinton Post, book, this scholarly journal article, magazine, etc. — CactusWriter (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, sources added by CactusWriter appear to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca talk 17:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.