Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukari Mononobe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yukari Mononobe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An "original character" with no indication that this has notability. I can find nothing on this in Japanese and searches in English only find a mention or two on personal sites. Michitaro (talk) 00:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under criteria A11. This looks like a character made up by the article creator. I've added the A11 tag to the article. Calathan (talk) 05:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My speedy deletion nomination was declined, but I still think this should be deleted as non-notable. Calathan (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Non-notable fan fiction character [1] [2] inspired by the characteristics and names of two Touhou project characters. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per above. ~Mable (chat) 12:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have declined the A11 speedy nomination, because WP:CSD#A11 requires that the article plainly indicates that the subject was invented by the article author or someone personally known to them. Suspicion is not enough. However, delete as non-notable. JohnCD (talk) 13:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've redone the deletion request as a WP:A7 no indication of importance - web content. The only place where it appears is on the author's page and a user-generated wikia entry for fan fiction characters. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I also wanted to nominate this for speedy deletion, but I couldn't see a category that fit "unnotable fictional character," so I went through AfD. Michitaro (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that speedy deletion nomination. Fictional characters are not one of the subjects covered by A7. Merely having information about a subject available on the Internet does not make it "web content" (if it did, almost everything would qualify as web content). Web content in this sense is things like web sites, browser games, blogs, etc., that are inherently something you access with a web browser. Calathan (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is technically an idea from a blog, but that's fine if it doesn't fit A7. Still gets a delete. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of notability. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Eh, I'm ambivalent about the speedies, but yeah, I see nothing either, so a SNOW close wouldn't be a bad idea--by my count, we now have 7 deletes and 0 keeps, including the nominator. Jclemens (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.