The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
SUPPORT per nom. I was the one who dug into the Category:Laundry a few months ago and I guess triggered this minor cascade of changes, which is long overdue. Wikipedia has done well on military history and US pop culture, and can afford to turn its attention to textiles and food. BTW I definitely support the use of "occupation" or "job" in most of these article and category names, and not "profession", a la Cooper (profession). But I digress. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: (Afaics) we have no articles about Nigerian demonyms. Article categories (i.e. not categories specifically for redirects, dabs etc) are to help people navigate to articles. In some cases there may be a good reason to include a few redirects in an article category, but there is no need for such a category that contains only redirects. DexDor(talk)17:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Artists" categories on Wikipedia are for visual artists, not musicians -- categories for musicians need to be named as "musicians", not as "artists". Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
