Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 2

< June 1	June 3 >

June 2

File:Spanish Grand Prix, 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

non-free screenshot used to illustrate the concept that negative numbers are used in TV broadcasts. The concept can easily be described in text alone without significantly impairing our reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 and [WP:NFCC#8]] Peripitus (Talk) 06:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If is was so important to show the original numbers then they could have been heavily cropped from the main image. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZacharyColeSmithbyHediSlimane.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

replaceable fair use image that falls into one of the unacceptable uses on the non-free content guideline. - Peripitus (Talk) 06:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 06:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pie-Pacifique with Nelson Mandela, 2006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed, and Pie-Pacifique is still alive, so free photos of him can easily be created. Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I left a note with these same concerns on uploader's talkpage after I had tagged it {{di-replaceable fair use}}. User:Ronhjones disputed that tag because at least one of the subjects of this particular image is deceased. DMacks (talk) 19:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just received the confirmation via OTRS from the photo creator "Mandela Rhodes Foundation" that we can use it only for wikipedia article. So i think this image can be stayed at Pie-Pacifique article since there is no free license image. Regards. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket 2014060210012759 Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As I told the user on my talk page, the actual image is probably not replaceable as we have a deceased person, however I did also point out that as a non-free image it needs to satisfy all the WP:NFCC in order to remain. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the image is to illustrate an article about a living person. The fact that the image also shows a deceased person is irrelevant. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you have stated it lacks the critical commentary to keep the image. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iranian director.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by sock/meatpuppet of Manimihan (see here) who is blocked on the Commons for repeatedly uploading copyvios of this person and images related to his work. See, for example, all of the delinker edits in the history of Hossein Shahabi. Lower resolution image of notable person uploaded by sock with only copyvio uploads suggest DUCK copyvio. At best, OTRS permission would be needed. Эlcobbola _talk 20:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD#G5 does not seem to apply as no account identified on Commons is blocked on Wikipedia. Elcobbola's description of the user suggests that we should delete as likely copyvio. EXIF says that the photograph was taken on the day before the upload, so it seems to be a very recent photograph. Could that indicate that the photo actually is legitimate? --Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Metadata is easily altered; indeed, here the metadata was last modified 03:37, 2 June 2014. That's not to say they did or did not alter the metadata, merely that it is so unreliable a measure as to be more or less meaningless for substantiation - thus the desire for OTRS. Эlcobbola _talk 20:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This picture was photographed by me and the photos allowed me to load it on Wikipedia.Please do not delete the photo.Thank you Kalame10 (talk) 10:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi Эlcobbola

Internet restrictions in place because of our government to operate. I am not Sockpuppets of Manimihan. You care for all of our colleagues have been locked in Wikipedia. Please do not hurt us. Thank you. Kalame10 (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Kalame10 (talk) 19:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Эlcobbola. You blocked me for this picture. We do not Sockpuppets of Manimihan. We participated in a collaboration. Please do not remove this image. Thank you.Sahelchi (talk) 20:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elcobbola, Sahelchi suggests that he also uploaded the same file. Is this correct? Can it from the two uploads be concluded that at least one of them must have a wrong source, unless the users are sockpuppets of each other? Did you use checkuser tools to prove sockpuppetry? --Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Sahelchi did not upload any files or make any edits on the Commons. The account was blocked as a sleeper sock of Manimihan; checkuser tools indeed confirmed these are the same and/or related users. Эlcobbola _talk 04:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Эlcobbola Hi Stefan2.

We're working on a building of our internet from one network unit. The Iranian government has very limited internet users. Please help us rather than blocking.If we are wrong due to unfamiliarity with the rules of Wikipedia. Thank you very much.Kalame10 (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.