Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 10

< April 9	April 11 >

April 10

File:Pentax 18-55mm in lightbox.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, blurry, low resolution, no encyclopedic value FASTILY 03:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sire.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: license changed to Pd-textlogo Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this logo copyrightable? It looks like a yin-yang symbol without opposite dots within. If not, shall we restore previous versions of the file and then transfer any of them into Commons? George Ho (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:JeetKuneDo.svg was denied copyright registration and is without question more complex than this, so no, I doubt that this is copyrightable.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lucky Star Single Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The single "Lucky Star" by Madonna was one of her big hits in history. A reader might understand the song more by looking at a cover or a side label. Because the side label of the U.S. vinyl pressing is uploaded as the infobox image, I wonder whether the front cover of one of overseas releases is necessary. There is already a free image of Madonna in the article. George Ho (talk) 04:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 21:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This appears to have been released first in the UK. Why are we keeping the US version and not the UK version? Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She is American (or Italian American), Calliopejen1; also, the song was made by Americans. I thought about replacing this image with the sunglasses image, but both UK images have the same rationale as displaying a UK release of the American song. Also, the copyright status of the above image used in the US side label is discussed. --George Ho (talk) 06:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cursive IPA sample (1912) (2).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally, superior version available: File:Cursive IPA sample (1912).png FASTILY 04:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DJ-Elephante-headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, scaled-down crop of File:DJ-Elephante.jpg FASTILY 04:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:North Geelong Warriors Hall of Fame.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a derivative of non-free content (commemorative plaque) FASTILY 05:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luka Glavas and kids.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright holder is listed in EXIF as "National Premier Leagues IGA NSW Mens 1 All Rights Reserved 2014 (Photos by loop)". No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder FASTILY 05:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paperback Writer by The Beatles UK vinyl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus ★ Bigr Tex 18:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this image free to transfer? It is a UK work; threshold of originality there is very low. I wonder whether facts in any form count in the UK for copyright. George Ho (talk) 06:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sweet Love by Anita Baker US vinyl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus ★ Bigr Tex 18:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this image transferable to Commons? The logo of the record label might not be copyrightable despite red markings on it. Speaking of red, there is a red shade on the bottom half of the side label. George Ho (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Liam McLaughlan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted non-cropped version, kept cropped version Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contains a derivative of non-free content (the screen in the background) FASTILY 07:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like radically cropping the image may help with this issue.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SEECP members.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally, superior version available at File:Southeast European Cooperation Process Map.svg FASTILY 08:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SteveNeil 85weirdest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, unclear if uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 09:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trolley01.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, likely no encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 09:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low resolution. Missing source/license evidence. Kelly ^hi! 09:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Masoud Alimohammadi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists. Additionally, the FURs are incomplete. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Addressed by Tucoxn. Mhhossein (talk) 10:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 states: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." How does the presence of this image significantly increase readers' understanding of Assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists. Your previous comment, adding the image back into the article says, "the issue was fixed". No changes have been made to the article reflecting NFCC#8 as of UTC 10:11, 10 April 2016 (see the article's edit history). Could you please provide details on what changes were made that merit marking this {{done}}? Cheers! - tucoxn\^talk 11:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, the answer is easy. Stefan2 crossed the file out of the article per WP:NFCC#10c, then I added a use rationale and the name of the article to file page and said that the NFCC#10c issue was fixed. Meanwhile, Stefan came here and maintained that the file had NFCC#8 issue which was right and you crossed it out of the page, in fact you did the job of addressing the case, as I mentioned above. Hence I marked it as done by you! Any questions? Mhhossein (talk) 07:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the mention of that article from the file's page. This issue should be able to be closed now. Cheers! - tucoxn\^talk 15:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whiskey Ring 03.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned map. No source given for base map. Kelly ^hi! 10:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I was listed as making the map. The original blank map came from a free share map on the internet. Cmguy777 (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence provided that the source map is freely licensed. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was uploaded 12-21-09. I can't find the original free share map source. I have no issues concerning the photo being deleted. Cmguy777 (talk) 19:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whiskey Ring.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned map. No source given for base map. Kelly ^hi! 10:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I was listed as making the map. The original blank map from a free share map on the internet. Cmguy777 (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence provided that the source map is freely licensed. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was uploaded 12-21-09. I can't find the original free share map source. I have no issues concerning the photo being deleted. Cmguy777 (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xiuhmolpilli.1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear if uploader is creator. Used only in userspace of long-absent editor. Kelly ^hi! 10:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fred Meyer Jewelers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused outdated logo for Fred Meyer Jewelers, low-resolution, missing source information. FASTILY 10:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:600px-Arab League members colored by joining date with Israel colored in blue.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Kelly ^hi! 10:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abre la Muralla.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in userspace of long-gone editor. No encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 10:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AdhiKumbheshwararTemple trimmed.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 10:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Akram ut tarajim 12 53.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text image. Kelly ^hi! 11:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Allstonians Haunt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused band photo. Kelly ^hi! 11:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlmaMaterMKHS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of text. Kelly ^hi! 11:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlphaOmega2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear if uploader is copyright holder. Only used on userpage of editor gone for over 10 years. Kelly ^hi! 11:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Strictly Judges from series7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a screenshot for the judges of Strictly Come Dancing. The image does not significantly increase the reader's understanding of the show and fails NFCC#8. Additionally, 3 of the four judges' articles have free images illustrating them. Whpq (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.