Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Basshunter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:13, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Basshunter

Stillborn Wikiproject with about 30 articles in it's total scope, about one person, and only one member, the creator. Zero discussion after 6+ months. No objection to the user userfying his work but this should not be a Wikiproject as the scope is too small.

Portal similarly lacks broad scope with just 30 articles in total scope. The supporting wikiproject is of course one person and therefore not a WikiProject (which is defined as a group of people). Legacypac (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Useless stillborn wikiproject and crud portal that need to be eliminated. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. In this case we can consolidate the two deletions. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What Wikipedia will gain on delete WP and portal? It include over 30 articles. Scope isn't too small. It's a lot of work to do. WP page is helpfull. Finally there are more WP's with one member or only or less than 30 articles total scope. Eurohunter (talk) 21:54, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... what? CoolSkittle (talk) 22:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read again. Eurohunter (talk) 23:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

nope, still don't get it. For future reference, WP is short for Wikipedia, so you appear to be saying "What Wikipedia will gain on delete Wikipedia". CoolSkittle (talk) 00:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No he means WikiProject. WikiProjects with only one or two members are failed ideas, still born, and deleted or data moved to userspace. WikiProjects require active members. Legacypac (talk) 00:41, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oh I see. Perhaps we need a better acronym for wikiproject to avoid (my?) confusion. CoolSkittle (talk) 01:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it will be understandable in discussion about WikiProject. I can go and try to find 2-3 members. I think it should be possible. Should I do it? The last option would be to move WikiProject page to Basshunter discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A wikiproject for one singer is not going to be able to gain and hold participemts. It's ju–st to narrow. We can move the page into your userspace or you can copy the key info there but no WikiProject in Wikipedia space makes sense for this narrow topic. Legacypac (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is many wikiprojects for one singer so it's not argument. Eurohunter (talk) 13:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only because no one has bothered to seek deletion. Most Wikiprojects are dead anyway Legacypac (talk) 15:20, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you see deletion of Christina Aguilera, Kylie Minogue or Rihanna wikiprojects? Eurohunter (talk) 17:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe... if they lack activity and are better handled under a wider scope wikiproject Legacypac (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schould I find more participants then? Eurohunter (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: Legacypac. Eurohunter (talk) 10:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.